11.03.2009

Osama bin Laden Responsible for the 9/11 Attacks? Where is the Evidence? David Ray Griffin Infowars November 2, 2009

This article from 911 Blogger - demonstrates typically excellent logic from David Ray Griffin - I'm a fan of his for this logic. Here's a little:

"The idea that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attacks has been an article of faith for public officials and the mainstream media. Calling it an “article of faith” points to two features of this idea. On the one hand, no one in these circles publicly challenges this idea.

On the other hand, as I pointed out at length in two of my books – 9/11 Contradictions1 and The New Pearl Harbor Revisited,2 no good evidence has ever been publicly presented to support it."


So Dr. Griffin makes a statement, then backs that statement up with his reasoning behind the statement. For this I greatly admire him and acknowledge his peerless positive contribution to closing in on the truth of the 911 attacks.

In reading the comments beneath the article on 911 Blogger rw said he took issue with David Ray Griffin as a herald to the truth movement because he is spreading other myths while helping the 911 cause - then we're going to have to deal with fixing those myths.

I don't agree or disagree with the above commenter - I appreciate the honesty of the comment and know it is obviously there to contribute to getting closer to the truth of what happened on the fateful day 9-11-01.

But I take issue with David Ray Griffin on his support of One World Government also known as "The New World Order" - buzzword for the surrender of American's Bill of Rights through legal process - specifically usurping the Constitution the only way it can be done legally from what I hear - via TREATY.

I would challenge those who think world government will serve you better than this den of scamsters now passing as Congresspersons to think through the process whereby you get action out of your Congress, President, Judicial System - then multiply the number of layers by a trillion - now - try to get through to the tax department of the great World Entity that is on track for world peace. You never will.

I wish DRG would think of this when he discusses the logical pattern of continuing the combination of governments until it ends up in one government - and he would consider that perhaps there are better ways for us to get together yet keep our freedom and national identity - both of which will dissolve in a one world government.

If anybody wants a one world government - you can apply for statehood with the United States of America under which you will be protected by your exercise of your rights as documented in the Bill of Rights to the Constitution of the US.

2 comments:

  1. When One World Government comes, we will need a common international language as well. As a native English speaker, I would prefer Esperanto.

    Your readers may be interested in http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=_YHALnLV9XU Professor Piron was a translator with the United Nations in Geneva.

    The argument for Esperanto can be seen at http://www.lernu.net

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Brian- we need all the info we can get. I'll check out your links.

    ReplyDelete

Only by exercising YOUR freedom of speech shall you keep it. Comment now - I can handle it....