6.21.2014

Amazing parallels: JFK murder and 911


Here we have Garrison trying to overcome groupthink - it takes forever - he really was the only "lone" hero...

Above we have the Harley guy giving the entire conclusion of the 911 omission, er uhm, commission, just moments after the event.  Such a prescient fellow indeed...hmmmmmm.....
And above, if you have the time, you'll see this credible man tell us how he got the news about Oswald early since he was out of country.  Yet another prepared propaganda campaign to cement the fairy tale into the public mind.

How many times can we allow our public to be manipulated using these herd techniques?

31 comments:


  1. West Desperately Needs Anti-Semitic Christian Revival--As Of Romans Under St. Constantine The Great

    Jack: as long as people have their bread & circuses, they don't care about squat. People only start to take notice after horrific disaster and not until then. In fact, many many of them simply have to die--they never figure anything out--and then only a remnant even begins to doing anything.

    And note I already explained to u, several times, how history is CYCLIC, according to "Decline of the West," by Oswald Spengler. Society becomes "successful," "victorious," and "prosperous," as it becomes an empire, a generation of inferiors is bred-up who didn't have to FIGHT like their ancestors did, who made the successful society in the first place.

    This generation of inferiors then suffers HUBRIS and imagines they can be "good," and that it's "good" now to tolerate crafty liars and criminals like the Jews who are now allowed to taking-over the society, instituting their scams, like present US Federal Reserve Bank ("Fed") COUNTERFEITING machine.

    Naturally, the society must collapse after some crises. West must now hope for situation like Roman emp. of late 3rd, early 4th cent., if it is possible, for a revival, resurgence--the real Christianity is necessary, which is forthrightly anti-Semitic, removing the queers and the Jew-friendly traitors.


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your article wrote a good, I come back and nice to see your new article,

      hazel games
      kissing games

      Delete
  2. Apsterian:

    I agree with much of what you say - but that doesn't leave much room for the individual. Where do I, Jack Rabbit fit into all of this?
    I don't want to succumb to groupthink and I certainly don't like watching things die while doing nothing.

    If there really is a God, as you say, then why did he give me a brain to think, judgement so I can judge, and this horrible compulsion to blog?

    It is frustrating watching the masses take such a beating, and even more so having no ability to sway the overall situation once one can see it for what it is. Then there are times I think the masses deserve it.

    Since I've been living amongst the indigent now, I've written some small things trying to express that there is no more good or bad regarding socioeconomic habitat. The businesspeople that run the places I frequent now (broken laundramat, fast food ratholes with sour orange juice etc...) are just bottom feeders - but they are here if you need them so they provide a service.

    I do believe our society is collapsing - but whether or not that is due to the cyclic nature of things or according to a plan is another topic. Kennedy wasn't killed by history - he was killed by businesspersons who saw him getting in the way of making a buck. 911 wasn't done by idealistic Muslims - it was done by businesspeople who needed to re-stimulate the masses - after the media lead-up of course.

    ...and the next big one =- will push us into the next phase of our demise - or rise to "greatness" once again. Whatever that means.

    JR

    ReplyDelete
  3. Apsterian: the other problem with the benevolent emperor concept is that emperorships go through the same cycle you discussed happens to the country in general.

    Also I will never tolerate a religion-based government because religion really is "organized one-mindedness" and when religious power becomes enshrined in ones government people like you and I, who have the ability to differ in opinion yet discuss those differences will no longer be tolerated - in fact - will become an endangered species leading to another dark age of thought.
    JR

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Christianity Is Worship Of Truth--Against Jew Lies And Subjectivity

      Well Jack: it's actually good for u and us to consider and analyze Christianity for what it's really about. Remember it reminds us (as it did the Judeans--not "Jews"--of the day) that there's such thing as truth, hence objective reality.

      U gotta realize what Christianity is--in contrast to what it opposes, Jew lies--much like the Hegelian antitheses, truth vs. lies; objectivity vs. subjectivism.

      Christ actually applauds and endorses use of reason, logic, etc.--this upon basis there's an objective truth which we CAN figure out w. reason and honesty, etc., the elements of Holy Spirit--the means of apprehending such TRUTH--reason and honesty. (Remember there are smart/rational folks who are not honest, and honest folks who don't reason nearly enough).

      Such Christian reason and affirmation of objectivity, hence truth founded thereupon, was/is AGAINST lies and subjectivity of Pharisees (JEWS) who insist the only truth/reality is what's good for Jews, etc., subjectivity, remember, the basis of lies.

      The only "one-mindedness" of the real Christianity is upon truth, hence founded upon the objective reality--which requires reason and honesty. "Faith" for Christianity only properly means LOYALTY--not "believing" stupid crap which makes no sense.

      "One-mindedness" then properly refers to INTEGRITY, that reason & honesty pervading throughout both conscious and subconscious--the real Holy Spirit by which to grasp TRUTH, the only way to Godly happiness (Gosp. JOHN 14:6).

      Such then is Christianity, featuring TRUTH above all/any other values, which u MUST consider as contrasted w. Judaism founded upon lies, subjectivism, the most usual vehicle of such subjectivity the fallacious "good" and HUBRISTIC perfectly "free" human will.

      Delete
    2. Apsterian says: "Christianity Is Worship Of Truth--Against Jew Lies And Subjectivity"

      Jack Rabbit Says: "Christianity Is Worship Of Truth--Against ALL Lies And Subjectivity"

      JR

      Delete
    3. If that is the premise of what follows...

      Let me read the rest - we'll have to negotiate upon premises - that's a big one...

      JR

      Delete
    4. Apsterian: Here's another problem - let's say you are right and we wipe out all the Jews doing all this stuff. What about the rest of those engaged in all these immoral activities?

      Fact: same standard applies so sub-population not necessary to discuss solutions -

      ALL violators of human rights are still violators - Jews or not.

      We must solve problems in their entirety...

      JR

      Delete
    5. Judaism Must Perish

      Right, but kikes are the LEADERS, by exterminating Jews, u effectively cut the head off the snake--so that rest of job is mere mopping-up.

      History and later generations MUST learn about satanic Jews (a redundancy) and that Jews LOST and were exterminated by triumphant, Christian humanity.

      Note extermination should be "Christian," Jews being arrested, interned, confiscated, separated by sex, and watched carefully as they die out.

      Jews of race (but who MUST repudiate the religion) who are loyal to humanity still cannot hold office, vote, or pro-create. History must put "PAID" to Judaism once and for all.

      Delete
    6. Apsterian

      What if your policy is implemented then "we" find out that you are a jew due to some genetic snafu...

      would you order your own execution to save the world?

      JR

      Delete
  4. I couldn't be Jew by religion/philosophy, which is what counts most--race would be more questionable, but I'm about as sure as possible. Remember u don't have to be "executed"--just don't re-produce.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apsterian: uhm, err heh heh - you wouldn't back-pedal now would you?

      JR

      Delete
    2. No, I wouldn't--I answered ur question, didn't I? Remember: the final solution has to be Christian for manner of execution--exterminating Judaism doesn't necessarily require executions--except for criminal penalties already stipulated by law.

      Delete
  5. But you could also be lying. I accuse you of being a Jew.

    JR

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I could be lots of things, and u can accuse all u pls. But we all know u haven't slightest evidence, ho ho ho ho--I'm staunch Christian soldier and will surely go straight to heaven--unlike u who accuses without any justification, grounds or evidence.

      Delete
    2. I accuse you of everything you accuse Jews of doing - that's why I suspect you of being a Jew. You are using their logic.

      JR

      Delete
    3. ...not that I find anything wrong with being a Jew. I just thought I'd bring up that observation.

      JR

      Delete
    4. ... because you are running a "false flag" operation - trying to make Christians seem bad...
      ...but you are really the "Jew"....

      JR

      Delete
    5. JR: u're just a brainless moron. I've always given my references and premises for conclusions, u poor idiot. And as I noted for ur most recent blog, u're just brain-washed whether by Jews-media or whatever. Christianity worships truth, stupid; Jews worship lies--and u're the liar, ho ho ho.

      Delete
  6. C'mon Apsterian,

    You are using terms and self-contradictory language.

    Consider: (from the infallible Wikipedia)
    "Moron" was coined in 1910 by psychologist Henry H. Goddard[3] from the Ancient Greek word μωρός (moros), which meant "dull"[4] (as opposed to oxy, which meant "sharp" (see also: oxymoron)), and used to describe a person with a mental age in adulthood of between 8 and 12 on the Binet scale.[5] It was once applied to people with an IQ of 51–70, being superior in one degree to "imbecile" (IQ of 26–50) and superior in two degrees to "idiot" (IQ of 0–25).
    "

    Also - it is impossible to be brainless and achieve status of moron or idiot, so am I being reasonable to ask that you stick to your promise and get definitions and premises and references correct.

    You don't happen to live in a glass house do you?...

    JR

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JR: truth and fact is U'RE THE JEW, aren't u?

      Delete
    2. Apsterian:

      So far - the question remains unsettled. I can only say that I don't consider myself a Jew - or anything really - I'm just ..... me.....

      JR

      Delete

  7. JR Only Demonstrates His Own Perfect Programming In Defending Jews

    Well JR, to go by the inductive evidence, u could very well be a Jew, eh?--consider the items we have to go on.

    (a) U lie, saying I try to make "Christians seem bad." But I actually, simply show why Christianity is "good," so to speak, giving citations, etc.

    (b) U say, above, I use Jew logic, which is another lie. My logic is perfect and straight-forward.

    (c) U imply I try to make Christians look "bad" by (ur supposed) slandering of Jews, evidently--but I don't at all slander Jews, carefully giving all my ref.s and premises for conclusions.

    In conclusion, u continue to demonstrate my thesis given in ur latest blog's comments section about the "teevee" mental programming as it is reflected in ur obsessive insistence upon defending Jews--u're actually best proof for the mind-programming that u ostensibly condemn, aren't u?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Apsterian,
    You didn't define "inductive" evidence - or the mechanism of inductive reasoning - so I will chalk up the rest of your comment for consideration after I understand the premises upon which they are being made.

    Thanks in advance,

    J Rabbit

    ReplyDelete
  9. (Music from Jeperdy playz)

    JR

    ReplyDelete
  10. ...and by the way sumthin'...

    you still meet your own qualifications for being a Jew on top of not explaining inductive stuff.

    Oh - and if I'm a "Jew" for my arguments - that's OK with me if it will assist in communications.

    JR

    ReplyDelete
  11. ...oh and another thing - the Second Amendment makes it ok for anyone to be anything they happen to be...as long as they don't infringe on someone else's rights.

    So don't Jews have the right to bear arms?

    JR

    ReplyDelete

  12. JR: it's ur responsibility to understand words of the language u pretend to speaking, and there are dictionaries if u need to look something up.

    "Induction" is simply concluding in general proposition for particular observations/premises. Thus I concluded fm particular observations upon u--u're the Jew in all likelihood (generalization fm the particular evidence)--while I'm not.

    No, Jews are enemies of humanity; hence they have no rights humanity must observe--they're forfeited, obviously.



    ReplyDelete
  13. Apsterian: So first, you provide an excuse for an incomplete definition of a word you used, induction in case you forgot, then you give a lame definition.

    The problem really is - about a definition of a word you used - a word you don't really understand....

    perhaps that's part of your problem understand these....."jews".......

    .........JR

    ReplyDelete
  14. Apsterian: Are you for or against the right to bear arms for Jews? I am FOR the right to bear arms for Jews.

    Please answer - unequivocally - to preserve your credibility...

    JR

    ReplyDelete

Only by exercising YOUR freedom of speech shall you keep it. Comment now - I can handle it....