.jpg)
Why?
My compliments to the balsy folks that confronted Alex Jones - this is exactly the information the public needs to see how "divide and conquer" works.
2.12.2010
Alex Jones: Too Big for us Peons?
Alex Jones hijacks an ongoing protest in an arrogant display of megalomania. Rather than being an ally of the protesters on the scene he becomes a divider bringing confusion to an event already underway. While a "speaking platform" for the event had already been established - with a speaker on a megaphone already talking - Alex Jones appears with his own megaphone, walks up with a small entourage and begins shouting into his own megaphone effectively drowning out those who already had a good thing going.
Why?
My compliments to the balsy folks that confronted Alex Jones - this is exactly the information the public needs to see how "divide and conquer" works.
Why?
My compliments to the balsy folks that confronted Alex Jones - this is exactly the information the public needs to see how "divide and conquer" works.
Video: International Bankers Finance Both Sides in War
"They were terribly cynical people who felt that the war would end as all wars do and they would go back to business as usual."
It is ironic that the video below - "Banking with Hitler" - begins with a mechanism for the payment of reparations by Germany to the victors of the "War To End All Wars" - the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Somehow this international banking mechanism became the enabler for the next worldwide bloodbath - World War 2. I suspect the same is occuring today.
Information gleaned from the diaries and records of Henry Morganthau, president Franklin Delano Roosevelt's secretary of the treasury, is elucidated in the video below. Described is the story of how both national and international banks created a system that financed the NAZIs.
When Hitler annexed Austria, the Austrian gold reserves kept at the BIS were transferred to Germany's accounts. Same for Holland, Poland and Czechoslovakia. The Czech transfers were persuaded at the point of a pistol - and not blocked by the key player at the Bank of England who could have stopped it. The Bank of England's position on the BIS didn't change even as British and French troops were being slaughtered by the NAZIs and driven back to Dunkirk. With friends like the Bank of England - who needs enemies? In light of recent banking scandals, and considering that history repeats, is it wise to expect international bankers are dependable benevolent public servants? Not only no - hell no!
It seems that we all know the international bankers have a stranglehold on our money - and those who inquire into the "why" regarding our need for them are dismissed as "conspiracy theorists." Since I've already been labeled a "conspiracy theorist" and know the term is reserved exclusively for those citizens demonstrating superior critical thinking skills - I'll ask the question: Why do we need international bankers? Why can't we have our own money?
I don't know how anyone involved in armed conflict can watch this video without feeling duped and victimized. The persons interviewed describe how the international bankers have no moral compass when dealing with aggressor nations - as is pointed out - no one could tell which side would win the Second World War - in either case the bank would be needed, the point is made, so they "had to act like gentlemen." Right - while us plebian lower-class trash fight it out with M1 Garands and MG-42s. Also mentioned is the prudence "elites" exercise by hedging during world conflict - having a stake on both sides - this ensures the "elite's" survival regardless of the victor of World War 2 - Allied or Axis. We can see this has been exactly the outcome for companies like WMB, snemeiS, and others who were on the losing side of the conflict* - but on the winning side of survival and post-war profit. Now you know how.
An environment of civility between the "elites", the insiders, is discussed where our betters rubbed elbows, lived in luxury and got along just fine - regardless of their country's side in the war - while soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines from Allied and Axis nations fought to the death. Amazing that "elites" can work their problems out with civility but the populations can't. Or is that the whole idea?
Banking with Hitler
Go to time=3:49 below for what appears to be a country untouched by war - while surrounded completely. Perhaps we as Americans can challenge our leaders to provide us with a similar insurance policy that will ensure we stay out of war. Is America today in a more perilous position than the country on the map in the video was during WW2? **
--------
Perhaps you will find these previous blog posts interesting as well:
Why Are Wars Fought?
* Should Corporations share your First Amendment Right to Free Speech?: Antiques and a Job Description-PICTURES
**A Map of WW2 Europe - Something to Ponder-VIDEO
--------
UPDATE FEB 12, 2010 The collapse of the US economy - a letter to my bank (from Picasso Dreams
UPDATE FEB 19, 2010 Should Corporations share your First Amendment Right to Free Speech?: Antiques and a Job Description
UPDATE FEB 19, 2010 CIA and the NAZIs: How we got where we are today
It is ironic that the video below - "Banking with Hitler" - begins with a mechanism for the payment of reparations by Germany to the victors of the "War To End All Wars" - the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Somehow this international banking mechanism became the enabler for the next worldwide bloodbath - World War 2. I suspect the same is occuring today.
Information gleaned from the diaries and records of Henry Morganthau, president Franklin Delano Roosevelt's secretary of the treasury, is elucidated in the video below. Described is the story of how both national and international banks created a system that financed the NAZIs.
When Hitler annexed Austria, the Austrian gold reserves kept at the BIS were transferred to Germany's accounts. Same for Holland, Poland and Czechoslovakia. The Czech transfers were persuaded at the point of a pistol - and not blocked by the key player at the Bank of England who could have stopped it. The Bank of England's position on the BIS didn't change even as British and French troops were being slaughtered by the NAZIs and driven back to Dunkirk. With friends like the Bank of England - who needs enemies? In light of recent banking scandals, and considering that history repeats, is it wise to expect international bankers are dependable benevolent public servants? Not only no - hell no!
It seems that we all know the international bankers have a stranglehold on our money - and those who inquire into the "why" regarding our need for them are dismissed as "conspiracy theorists." Since I've already been labeled a "conspiracy theorist" and know the term is reserved exclusively for those citizens demonstrating superior critical thinking skills - I'll ask the question: Why do we need international bankers? Why can't we have our own money?
I don't know how anyone involved in armed conflict can watch this video without feeling duped and victimized. The persons interviewed describe how the international bankers have no moral compass when dealing with aggressor nations - as is pointed out - no one could tell which side would win the Second World War - in either case the bank would be needed, the point is made, so they "had to act like gentlemen." Right - while us plebian lower-class trash fight it out with M1 Garands and MG-42s. Also mentioned is the prudence "elites" exercise by hedging during world conflict - having a stake on both sides - this ensures the "elite's" survival regardless of the victor of World War 2 - Allied or Axis. We can see this has been exactly the outcome for companies like WMB, snemeiS, and others who were on the losing side of the conflict* - but on the winning side of survival and post-war profit. Now you know how.
An environment of civility between the "elites", the insiders, is discussed where our betters rubbed elbows, lived in luxury and got along just fine - regardless of their country's side in the war - while soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines from Allied and Axis nations fought to the death. Amazing that "elites" can work their problems out with civility but the populations can't. Or is that the whole idea?
Banking with Hitler
Go to time=3:49 below for what appears to be a country untouched by war - while surrounded completely. Perhaps we as Americans can challenge our leaders to provide us with a similar insurance policy that will ensure we stay out of war. Is America today in a more perilous position than the country on the map in the video was during WW2? **
--------
Perhaps you will find these previous blog posts interesting as well:
Why Are Wars Fought?
* Should Corporations share your First Amendment Right to Free Speech?: Antiques and a Job Description-PICTURES
**A Map of WW2 Europe - Something to Ponder-VIDEO
--------
UPDATE FEB 12, 2010 The collapse of the US economy - a letter to my bank (from Picasso Dreams
UPDATE FEB 19, 2010 Should Corporations share your First Amendment Right to Free Speech?: Antiques and a Job Description
UPDATE FEB 19, 2010 CIA and the NAZIs: How we got where we are today
2.10.2010
Some never before seen: NYPD World Trade Center 9/11 Aerial Photos
HERE'S A SAMPLE FROM ABC AT LINK BELOW : MANY THANKS TO ABC!!!
VIEW SLIDESHOW HERE FIRST THEN CONTINUE. Although the twin towers are featured I wish to call your attention to WTC 7 in the pictures - the smoking gun of 9/11.
From the article:
" Looking at these images never gets any easier. The photos that follow depict the horrible images of the September 11, 2001 attacks and the aftermath of the recovery efforts where some 2800 innocent people died, including those aboard hijacked flights American 11 and United 175. ABC News recently obtained these images after filing a Freedom of Information Act request in 2009 with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which had collected as part of an investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center. (Det. Greg Semendinger/NYC Police Aviation Unit"
------
Notes: Whether looking at the pics gets any easier or not makes no difference. One wonders why a Freedom of Information Act request is necessary to gain access to these photos. It is also bewildering that ABC news is interested enough in the WTC attacks to post some pictures but remains silent on the mountain of investigative work done by grass roots citizen investigators.
Pictures 3, 4, and 5 show WTC7 in remarkably good condition.
Remember that all 24 support columns of WTC 7 had to be removed within 1/10 of a second of each other for WTC 7 to collapse in the manner documented in the video below. The official explanation given to the public for the collapse of WTC 7 is that the collapse was caused by fire.
If you haven't yet seen this video please watch it - and compare with above photos.
See time = 6:31 in the video below for diagram showing building position.
Building 7 - Gone in 7 - WHAT YOU ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW ABOUT 9/11 !!
-------
UPDATE: Commission Chairman - The 911 Commission was set up to fail
UPDATE: NIST REPORT ON WTC7 DEBUNKED
UPDATE 60 Aerospace Engineers call for a New 9/11 Investigation
---------
UPDATE FEB 11, 2010 Another article with pictures, valuable additional information
------
UPDATE FEB 11, 2010 WATCH THIS AE911T VIDEO - GREAT PRESENTATION - WTC7
-------
UPDATE FEB 12, 2010 More labeling by propagandist Glenn Beck. This is exactly how you know Glenn Beck is not your friend.
-------
UPDATE FEB 13, 2010 JAMES FETZER - ON RELEASE OF NEW 911 PICTURES
2.09.2010
The Fort Knox Conundrum: Chinese say they received bogus bars of gold traced to U.S.
Read entire article here:
" At first, many gold experts speculated that the fake gold must have originated in China, which is considered the world’s best knock-off producers. However, the Chinese government investigated and issued a statement pointing a finger squarely at the United States."
-----
Note: Sorry - my government lied to me - so I have to take into consideration the assertions of those who meat-grinded their own people at Tienamin Square with tanks - and the incident running people over with tanks turning them into hamburger pales in comparison to what the American military is doing with depleted Uranium.
" At first, many gold experts speculated that the fake gold must have originated in China, which is considered the world’s best knock-off producers. However, the Chinese government investigated and issued a statement pointing a finger squarely at the United States."
-----
Note: Sorry - my government lied to me - so I have to take into consideration the assertions of those who meat-grinded their own people at Tienamin Square with tanks - and the incident running people over with tanks turning them into hamburger pales in comparison to what the American military is doing with depleted Uranium.
Support our Troops! Is Bravery in itself Heroic?
Is Bravery in itself heroic?
jackrabbit
I've heard the heroic tales of derring-do by the brave soldiers, sailors, airmen, cia, fbi etc... fighting the war on horror. Their bravery is the standard by which we pay them homage.*
But they are fighting an unjust, illegal, undeclared war - meaning they are fighting for a cause contrary to American morals (killing except in self-defense being one.)
But they are defending us you may say. Wrong. War based on torture-induced confessions based on demonstrable falsehoods (Tony Blair vids most recent example of ends justify means so if this lie didn't work we'll tell another that will) is not a defensive war, it is a war of aggression fomented by false-flag operations in concert with corporate media/propaganda apparatus fed to the public directly out of the pentagon. Conflict of interest is an understatement. These are wars of aggression - not of defense - thereby unjust wars. Equivalent - sorry because this seems to be getting old - equivalent to the wars of the NAZIs, Imperial Japanese, and Fascist Italy.
So to call Americans fighting this war on horror "heroes" one must also consider Hitler's SS troops - some of the finest, bravest, most devoted, sacrificial, zealous, feared, committed, skilled, effective military fighters of all time - HEROES. Also to be considered heroes are the U-boat force of NAZI Germany - talk about sacrifice - of the 40,000 men aboard German submarines, 30,000 never returned. That's what I call brave. Heroes by the standards of America today - and the exact standard of hero to which we hold our fighters of the "war on terror/horror" Why?
Because in both cases we allow ourselves the luxury of ignoring the CAUSE for which they fight. In both cases the fighters ignore the foundation of their efforts - that for which they fight - which in both cases are unjust wars of aggression.
So to continue our fawning adoration of our troops while ignoring the unjust, immoral, undeclared, fraudulent cause for which they actually are fighting is to repeat the mistakes of NAZI Germany - but so what?
Look at some pictures of the "Thousand Year Reich" after nature took its course and they lost the war. That is a picture of America's future. Rubble, smoke and death.
If we are going to repeat history we must remember that we will definitely repeat the entire timeline - right to the bitter end.
I hope those supporting the war on horror like the taste of wallpaper glue - because the way we are going - as history repeats itself - and we follow the path of past aggressor nations - we'll all get to taste the food of folly.
-----
*Sibel Edmonds, FBI translator - a real hero - silenced by our leaders for doing what is right not doing the "right thing" is the model that should be idolized but is instead gagged
jackrabbit
I've heard the heroic tales of derring-do by the brave soldiers, sailors, airmen, cia, fbi etc... fighting the war on horror. Their bravery is the standard by which we pay them homage.*
But they are fighting an unjust, illegal, undeclared war - meaning they are fighting for a cause contrary to American morals (killing except in self-defense being one.)
But they are defending us you may say. Wrong. War based on torture-induced confessions based on demonstrable falsehoods (Tony Blair vids most recent example of ends justify means so if this lie didn't work we'll tell another that will) is not a defensive war, it is a war of aggression fomented by false-flag operations in concert with corporate media/propaganda apparatus fed to the public directly out of the pentagon. Conflict of interest is an understatement. These are wars of aggression - not of defense - thereby unjust wars. Equivalent - sorry because this seems to be getting old - equivalent to the wars of the NAZIs, Imperial Japanese, and Fascist Italy.
So to call Americans fighting this war on horror "heroes" one must also consider Hitler's SS troops - some of the finest, bravest, most devoted, sacrificial, zealous, feared, committed, skilled, effective military fighters of all time - HEROES. Also to be considered heroes are the U-boat force of NAZI Germany - talk about sacrifice - of the 40,000 men aboard German submarines, 30,000 never returned. That's what I call brave. Heroes by the standards of America today - and the exact standard of hero to which we hold our fighters of the "war on terror/horror" Why?
Because in both cases we allow ourselves the luxury of ignoring the CAUSE for which they fight. In both cases the fighters ignore the foundation of their efforts - that for which they fight - which in both cases are unjust wars of aggression.
So to continue our fawning adoration of our troops while ignoring the unjust, immoral, undeclared, fraudulent cause for which they actually are fighting is to repeat the mistakes of NAZI Germany - but so what?
Look at some pictures of the "Thousand Year Reich" after nature took its course and they lost the war. That is a picture of America's future. Rubble, smoke and death.
If we are going to repeat history we must remember that we will definitely repeat the entire timeline - right to the bitter end.
I hope those supporting the war on horror like the taste of wallpaper glue - because the way we are going - as history repeats itself - and we follow the path of past aggressor nations - we'll all get to taste the food of folly.
-----
*Sibel Edmonds, FBI translator - a real hero - silenced by our leaders for doing what is right not doing the "right thing" is the model that should be idolized but is instead gagged
2.08.2010
An Open letter to the Alternative media (by Don Robertson)
The following article was written by an author I know - Don Robertson. Please read it - I'd like to know your thoughts.
---------------
John- I was listening just now when you called into Michael Rivero's What Really Happened SHOW.
Hence, this article I said I would not write, but which I have decided -to write. Unlike too many people we all know, I'm all too willing to admit -I am not infallible. LOL!
In your call to Michael, you were encouraging people to call-in to radio shows around the country to air the alternative view to climate change presented by the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and as -Al Gore divined it. LOL!
I have accused Michael Rivero of representing exactly half the problem in many matters he explores. He will be aware of my view, if he has not had that view dropped on his head like this. You are somewhat aware of my views, which must seem out in left field at times. You both serve a worthy purpose. I merely write to offer another view.
I'm comfortable out here in left field. Occasionally I catch a few fly balls. Well, -I've got my glove up, and I'm shielding the glare of the sun... I know that ball is up there -somewhere!
Hence this article I am submitting -which began right with my initial greeting given to you -opening this email. We'll call it an open letter to the alternative media.
I'm an informal guy. I have never been much impressed by myths inherent to genius, academia, humanitarianism, or any political activism that expresses itself on the political level. I followed the D.C sniper, -only wishing him bigger, more important targets.
I remember Eisenhower. I remember John Kennedy too, and Eugene McCarthy and Humbert Humphrey... I'm old guy. I knew better than to vote for that Barack Obama -fella.
I knew what was coming. Every president is worse than the previous president. Barack early on -looked like he had a high hurdle to clear. LOL!
People reading that last little paragraph will take exception to the statement. Let them.
Politically -what I fear most, is a president that really does capture what the people want. God forbid! The people are stupid.
I've also always been a know-it-all, the prerequisite for which is an unabashed willingness to be utterly wrong on occasion, if not just uh... regularly. That's me with a smile, a toothy grin, shit-eating -if you must! LOL!
When I was a kid, one of my older cousins used to call me Horny Donnie. God, I wish someone would call me that today. I've fallen in love, -literally smitten -with books though, and I'm more likely to be called four-eyes, because of some seriously specific necessity I wear my reading glasses on top of my hoary-white head.
Still, and this is the gist of what I am going to say here, I want your reading audience to consider exactly how encouraging it is to all these politicians, that one might stoop to their inane level, to debate them, or to offer evidence to the contrary of their lies.
Politicians grin like me and see the condescension as the white flag of surrender.
This unintended encouragement is easily gauged -if we examine the ongoing climate change propaganda-war.
Let me first say though, I find the environmental scientists -the worst of all scientists, a sub-class of a largess of hideously immoral fools that would meddle with the future like they were supposed be proved gods, if they don't destroy the planet in the process.
But what is destroying the planet?
The environmental scientist really proves the religious nature of all scientific work. I am not anti-religion half so much as I am anti-science. A lot kids today think what religion is doing is immoral. It may be, and certainly is in many instances. But almost universally, these same kids will say scientific work is amoral. OMFG!
I don't think anyone who worked on the theories, the actual creation of the A-bomb -or- the constantly redoubling efforts to build more of them better -is amoral. Nor do I find anyone amoral who works in any field that supports in any manner whatsoever -bio-weapons or genetic engineering.
And these stinking holier-than-thou environmental scientists, to the very last one, all of them are helping to build knowledge sets that describe exactly how to destroy the world in many-many ways.
Given what we all know about human nature, there is no other conclusion than can be made -than that these dumb bastards should know what they are doing, or, someone should point it out to them with a knuckle-sandwich right in the schnoz.
And to encourage anyone to argue this so-called science, (which when we look closely enough at the fundamental assumptions behind it -we find it is merely a gross witchcraft); such argumentation only encourages the acceptance of this witchcraft as some sort of worthy and viable science, -which it is not!
The proper way to address the global warming debate is to say, there is nothing wrong with the weather, or the climate per se. These things the weather and the climate operate according to very complex laws that are mostly beyond human comprehension, -and for human nature reasons- should remain beyond our inquiring concern.
We shouldn't be looking into such matters, for the knowledge is far too dangerous to put into the library of humanity open to the casual abuse or the utter negligence of every fool that calls himself a scientist, or a politician, -Horny Donnie, indeed!
There is everything wrong with humanity's assumption -that anyone can comprehend and ferret the truth of any such complex ideas as man-made global warming, without ever considering that there is something wrong with the scientists who made it all -so possible- in the first place. Take off the scientific blinders. I am going to punch you!
Scientists early on a few centuries ago -got an out, -based on the false notion that science is amoral. The solution as I have pointed out, is a knuckle-sandwich for these clearly nefarious scientific bastards, not cap and trade, nor even any more funding for science.
It is not global warming that is the problem at all. The problem we are experiencing everywhere in our society and throughout the world, is that our knowledge is forever incomplete in an infinitely complex reality. We cannot possibly understand these things well enough to try and do something about such complex beasts as these scientists create for us, like global warming or swine flu or the credit crisis.
There are enough stout men in the world -who might be better encouraged to level a few of these pretenders, pretenders to these rapidly multiplying and wholly fallacious scientific thrones, environmentalist, economist, physicist, genetic engineer... The despicable list goes on.
The world was good enough before global warming, and before whatever scientific thing it is that these scientific shaman are trying to blame for their global warming.
Just like when Treasury Secretary Paulson came out and told us, it would be the end of the world -if we didn't give him 700 billion dollars to play with, --all these scientists, whatever their ilk, should have their balls kicked hard enough up through their stomachs so that when they try and speak again, they can do no more than mumble.
Buy a gun. You're likely going to have to use it.
Don Robertson
------
---------------
John- I was listening just now when you called into Michael Rivero's What Really Happened SHOW.
Hence, this article I said I would not write, but which I have decided -to write. Unlike too many people we all know, I'm all too willing to admit -I am not infallible. LOL!
In your call to Michael, you were encouraging people to call-in to radio shows around the country to air the alternative view to climate change presented by the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and as -Al Gore divined it. LOL!
I have accused Michael Rivero of representing exactly half the problem in many matters he explores. He will be aware of my view, if he has not had that view dropped on his head like this. You are somewhat aware of my views, which must seem out in left field at times. You both serve a worthy purpose. I merely write to offer another view.
I'm comfortable out here in left field. Occasionally I catch a few fly balls. Well, -I've got my glove up, and I'm shielding the glare of the sun... I know that ball is up there -somewhere!
Hence this article I am submitting -which began right with my initial greeting given to you -opening this email. We'll call it an open letter to the alternative media.
I'm an informal guy. I have never been much impressed by myths inherent to genius, academia, humanitarianism, or any political activism that expresses itself on the political level. I followed the D.C sniper, -only wishing him bigger, more important targets.
I remember Eisenhower. I remember John Kennedy too, and Eugene McCarthy and Humbert Humphrey... I'm old guy. I knew better than to vote for that Barack Obama -fella.
I knew what was coming. Every president is worse than the previous president. Barack early on -looked like he had a high hurdle to clear. LOL!
People reading that last little paragraph will take exception to the statement. Let them.
Politically -what I fear most, is a president that really does capture what the people want. God forbid! The people are stupid.
I've also always been a know-it-all, the prerequisite for which is an unabashed willingness to be utterly wrong on occasion, if not just uh... regularly. That's me with a smile, a toothy grin, shit-eating -if you must! LOL!
When I was a kid, one of my older cousins used to call me Horny Donnie. God, I wish someone would call me that today. I've fallen in love, -literally smitten -with books though, and I'm more likely to be called four-eyes, because of some seriously specific necessity I wear my reading glasses on top of my hoary-white head.
Still, and this is the gist of what I am going to say here, I want your reading audience to consider exactly how encouraging it is to all these politicians, that one might stoop to their inane level, to debate them, or to offer evidence to the contrary of their lies.
Politicians grin like me and see the condescension as the white flag of surrender.
This unintended encouragement is easily gauged -if we examine the ongoing climate change propaganda-war.
Let me first say though, I find the environmental scientists -the worst of all scientists, a sub-class of a largess of hideously immoral fools that would meddle with the future like they were supposed be proved gods, if they don't destroy the planet in the process.
But what is destroying the planet?
The environmental scientist really proves the religious nature of all scientific work. I am not anti-religion half so much as I am anti-science. A lot kids today think what religion is doing is immoral. It may be, and certainly is in many instances. But almost universally, these same kids will say scientific work is amoral. OMFG!
I don't think anyone who worked on the theories, the actual creation of the A-bomb -or- the constantly redoubling efforts to build more of them better -is amoral. Nor do I find anyone amoral who works in any field that supports in any manner whatsoever -bio-weapons or genetic engineering.
And these stinking holier-than-thou environmental scientists, to the very last one, all of them are helping to build knowledge sets that describe exactly how to destroy the world in many-many ways.
Given what we all know about human nature, there is no other conclusion than can be made -than that these dumb bastards should know what they are doing, or, someone should point it out to them with a knuckle-sandwich right in the schnoz.
And to encourage anyone to argue this so-called science, (which when we look closely enough at the fundamental assumptions behind it -we find it is merely a gross witchcraft); such argumentation only encourages the acceptance of this witchcraft as some sort of worthy and viable science, -which it is not!
The proper way to address the global warming debate is to say, there is nothing wrong with the weather, or the climate per se. These things the weather and the climate operate according to very complex laws that are mostly beyond human comprehension, -and for human nature reasons- should remain beyond our inquiring concern.
We shouldn't be looking into such matters, for the knowledge is far too dangerous to put into the library of humanity open to the casual abuse or the utter negligence of every fool that calls himself a scientist, or a politician, -Horny Donnie, indeed!
There is everything wrong with humanity's assumption -that anyone can comprehend and ferret the truth of any such complex ideas as man-made global warming, without ever considering that there is something wrong with the scientists who made it all -so possible- in the first place. Take off the scientific blinders. I am going to punch you!
Scientists early on a few centuries ago -got an out, -based on the false notion that science is amoral. The solution as I have pointed out, is a knuckle-sandwich for these clearly nefarious scientific bastards, not cap and trade, nor even any more funding for science.
It is not global warming that is the problem at all. The problem we are experiencing everywhere in our society and throughout the world, is that our knowledge is forever incomplete in an infinitely complex reality. We cannot possibly understand these things well enough to try and do something about such complex beasts as these scientists create for us, like global warming or swine flu or the credit crisis.
There are enough stout men in the world -who might be better encouraged to level a few of these pretenders, pretenders to these rapidly multiplying and wholly fallacious scientific thrones, environmentalist, economist, physicist, genetic engineer... The despicable list goes on.
The world was good enough before global warming, and before whatever scientific thing it is that these scientific shaman are trying to blame for their global warming.
Just like when Treasury Secretary Paulson came out and told us, it would be the end of the world -if we didn't give him 700 billion dollars to play with, --all these scientists, whatever their ilk, should have their balls kicked hard enough up through their stomachs so that when they try and speak again, they can do no more than mumble.
Buy a gun. You're likely going to have to use it.
Don Robertson
------
Video: Assassination as US policy and the "Night of the Long Knives"
The "Greatest Generation" fought for nothing.
In light of recent news reports that it is U.S. government policy to assassinate American citizens - with White House approval of course - I thought it wise to take a walk down memory lane. A visit to the past to observe government run amok - with no regard for the rule of law. A government of men and not of laws. A government that will murder its own citizens. If you are an American - as you watch this - remember - you are looking into a mirror.
Perhaps you will watch the entire video - but to save time go to time=2:26 and listen to Ewald Von Kleist describe the point at which he and everybody else knew that they'd lost their country:
"this government... as a government started to become a murderer...remember that they shot a great number of people without any bringing them to court - they just killed them..."
Paul Craig Roberts on USA is a Police State
------
UPDATE FEB 13, 2010
US-NAZI INTEL - EXPLAINS HOW WE GOT WHERE WE ARE NOW
In light of recent news reports that it is U.S. government policy to assassinate American citizens - with White House approval of course - I thought it wise to take a walk down memory lane. A visit to the past to observe government run amok - with no regard for the rule of law. A government of men and not of laws. A government that will murder its own citizens. If you are an American - as you watch this - remember - you are looking into a mirror.
Perhaps you will watch the entire video - but to save time go to time=2:26 and listen to Ewald Von Kleist describe the point at which he and everybody else knew that they'd lost their country:
"this government... as a government started to become a murderer...remember that they shot a great number of people without any bringing them to court - they just killed them..."
Paul Craig Roberts on USA is a Police State
------
UPDATE FEB 13, 2010
US-NAZI INTEL - EXPLAINS HOW WE GOT WHERE WE ARE NOW
2.07.2010
The Good Guys and The Bad Guys
Read entire article here:
" The Good Guys believed in “I may not agree with what you say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it.”
The Bad Guys believed in don’t ask any questions, or we’ll shut you up, shut you out, or lock you away. Or bury you."
------
Note: I like this guy - can't tell ya' why. Maybe because he makes sense. White hats and black hats and uniforms and unicorns, it's all bullshit. Time to fire up the old synapses and wake up.
" The Good Guys believed in “I may not agree with what you say, but I’ll defend to the death your right to say it.”
The Bad Guys believed in don’t ask any questions, or we’ll shut you up, shut you out, or lock you away. Or bury you."
------
Note: I like this guy - can't tell ya' why. Maybe because he makes sense. White hats and black hats and uniforms and unicorns, it's all bullshit. Time to fire up the old synapses and wake up.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)