9.01.2013

Dr. Judy Wood 911 talk - worth watching

Science demands that all evidence is taken into consideration.  There is no excuse for ignoring this evidence.


12 comments:

  1. You Won't Find Truth In A Club

    The truth is known, but it appears that many people really don’t want to know the truth. They’d rather argue about opinions about rumors while trying to convince themselves that “nobody knows what happened & we’ll never know.” The facts about what happened have been available for many years. There was a paper refuting Steven Jones’ thermite story within a few months of the promotion of his theory but few paid attention. Jones vilified those who spoke the truth & that is all that was needed. Jones claimed the scientific refutation of his thermite story was a personal attack & his followers believed him without even questioning what they were told. Does this sound familiar, à la Bin Laden 9/11 story?

    In 2006, Dr. Wood published a paper with Morgan Reynolds documenting the group of holes in WTC6 & WTC5 as well as the major segment of WTC4 along with WTC3 that went missing & the "dustification" of WTC1, WTC2, & WTC7. But folks were too involved in stoning Dr. Wood to look at the evidence she presented so clearly. That is, most people seem to prefer drama instead of facts. That’s why it’s used so effectively in cover-ups. Few realize that Wood & Reynolds resigned from the Fetzer-Jones "truth club" in August 2006. Then they published the most effective article to date, addressing a huge amount of evidence that still stands un-refuted to this day.

    So why didn’t people realize this?

    If you remember, pretending to be in a fight with each other over Wood & Reynolds, Jones & Fetzer then launched a new distraction campaign. This had nothing to do with Wood & Reynolds because they had resigned the Fetzer-Jones "truth club" months earlier. But the distraction worked & few looked at the paper Wood & Reynolds published in early October 2006.

    What can we learn from this?

    The truth was right in front of us all along but manufactured controversy was very effective in distracting people away from the facts. There are people trying to convince us that we know so little & that we’ll never know what happened unless some specified criteria is met to the point of ad nauseam. Why would someone want to divert others away from the truth & try to convince them not to look? This is Déjà vu with Jones playing victim & claiming others have personally attacked him as well as the faux Jones & Fetzer fight to distract people away from the facts. The truth is known & has been known to those looking for it past the cover-up. Dr. Wood’s book has nicely gathered up an enormous amount of evidence. She leads the reader through the evidence while asking them questions to help them see it for themselves. Any honest person who reads that book will know what happened by the time they finish it. No exceptions. So why aren’t people reading her book? Because they prefer to create doubt & suspicion & believe false propaganda & argue about opinions of rumors of hearsay...around & around in circles on forums...instead of simply looking at the facts, just like those running the cover-up have taught them to do.

    The question is, will people just continue to marginalize those presenting the truth or will they realized they’ve been duped for 12 years & don’t want to continue being duped by those running the cover-up? Dr. Wood has mostly stood alone through all of this. Why has there been such a far reaching campaign to denigrate her? No one has ever refuted anything she has presented. They’ve only refuted the false propaganda about her & assume they were refuting her work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let's learn from this or history will repeat. AE911truth first opened their website about 3.5 weeks AFTER Dr. Wood submitted her Request for Corrections (RFC) to NIST. She was the first to submit an RFC that blew the whistle on the contractors for the NIST report. Can you say “damage control”? Then she filed a federal qui tam case that could have blown this whole case wide open, including putting people under oath – if there were enough supporters. Guess what? It became a policy in AE911Truth to ban those who discussed the work of Dr. Wood in an honest manor. If Richard Gage, founder & CEO of AE911truth, bought Dr. Wood’s book in the spring of 2011 and read it, he can no longer use “plausible deniability” as a defense. Mr. Gage is knowingly leading people away from the truth about 9/11 and using AE911Truth funds to accomplish this task. So leading people away from the truth must be the mission of AE911Truth. How else could he justify using AE911Truth funds to buy this book? Who funds AE911Truth? Donations through the donation drives on his site have dried up. However, donating creates a psychological hold on the donor and they are less likely to leave the organization or question Mr. Gage. Dr. Wood promotes independent thinking. Perhaps this is why she does not ask for donations on her website or conduct membership drives for a “truth club” to keep everyone in lockstep, where members are issued a list of talking points to focus on so that they don’t go looking for the truth. Dr. Wood is just one person. Richard Gage brags about having a large membership in lockstep with him. So why is he so concerned about just ONE person and radiates such anger at Dr. Wood? The truth is powerful and it emerges through independent thought.

    Why is there no Wikipedia page for Dr. Wood but one for Richard Gage that redirects to Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth?

    Wikipedia Search Results For Dr. Judy Wood
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=%22Dr.+Judy+Wood%22&go=Go

    Wikipedia Search Results For Richard Gage (Architect)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Gage_%28architect%29

    Try posting a Wikipedia page for Dr. Judy Wood & see how fast it's deleted!

    The truth is known & we had a chance. But well-meaning people who joined the "Truther Movement" were herded up & manipulated into trampling it. Groups are easy to manage & manipulate into being in lockstep with their leader. Sheeple need to leave the herd and read Dr. Wood's book before they are fleeced. You won't find truth in a club.

    http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well said. You are right.

    JR

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh - almost forgot. I wish I knew sooner about Jones' position in the cold fusion debate. I was under the impression (don't know why I messed this up) that he was for getting the tech out there - rather than instrumental in suppression.

    Getting to the truth is so difficult when so many people are liars. And so many liars in high places - powerful positions. All the way to the top.

    How can this be the "greatest country" in the world when it is controlled by murdering liars? It can't - it can never be. It can only become more of a plundered dump populated by the ignorant.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Gate Keepers by Charlie Pound
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6s1f1i_TpEs

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well Mr Goldstein,

    Can you enlighten us as to the exact technology used to demolish the twin towers? No sense beating around the bush - wouldn't you agree?

    JR

    ReplyDelete
  7. The number of people who believe that a PC and an Internet connection makes them a qualified forensic scientist is disturbing...

    The empirical EVIDENCE tells us that the majority of the buildings turned into dust in mid air. Therefore, something that can do this (turn it into dust in mid air) must exist. That is the proof that it exists. It happened. You don't need the serial numbers for the gizmo to know what happened. When "white man" first arrived on the American continent with firearms, indigenous people did not need to know the serial numbers of their weapons to know what they can do. They didn't need to have seen such weapons in order to know that there exists a weapon that can fire a piece of metal fast enough to kill their brother. Likewise, by the end of the day on August 6, 1945, the people living near Hiroshima, Japan, did not need to understand how a nuclear bomb works in order to know that there exists a technology that can produce enormous amounts of heat or to know that there exists a super-duper Kinetic Energy Weapon (KEW) that is capable of destroying an entire city.

    As Dr. Wood puts-forth in WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?, there is no evidence for the use of any kinetic device including super duper thermite or super duper micro mini nukes for these reasons. 1.) No seismic evidence. 2.) No sound evidence. 3.) No heat evidence. [i.e.unburnt paper] 4.) No blast evidence [i.e. the foundation "bathtub" remained intact and did not flood.]

    What Dr. Wood learned from preparing her textbook was that a more accurate term for the “dustification” of two quarter mile high skyscrapers with a combined weight of more than one million tons is “magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions”. The word “nuclear” is included because the molecular disassociation occurs at a nuclear level and should not to be confused with a conventional nuclear reaction. This term can be found in Chapter 17 The Tesla-Hutchison Effect, Section I. Apparent Transmutation, page 365, 3rd line from the top.

    The thermite or micro-nuke bandwagon is an excellent demonstration of just how easy it is to herd public opinion. Magicians don't need to lie; they just need to charm the audience into making wrong assumptions and the audience will generate the lies themselves. The lies don't need to last forever. They only need to last until it is too late to undo things and see more clearly. The simple fact, validated by the almost complete lack of commensurate debris on the ground at the World Trade Center complex, indicates that the buildings went up, they did not come down. By reading WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? you will discover the truth on your own as I have done. But before reading her book, I suggest reading Andrew Johnson's book first.

    9/11Finding the Truth
    A Compilation of Articles by Andrew Johnson Focused around the research and evidence compiled by Dr. Judy Wood

    Chapter 31. AE911 “Truth” and Other Sites Again Censor The Evidence 04 Apr 2010
    AE911 – Silently Deletes A Petition Signer (pages 297 to 300)
    http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/9-11%20-%20Finding%20the%20Truth.pdf

    In Appendix C, page 238, section C, (Refined searches) of Michael Armenia’s book, "Nanomanagement:The Disintegration of a Non-Profit Corporation", the name “Judy Wood” is a search term used to disqualify a person’s affiliation with AE911Truth.
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/124871928/Nanomanagement-The-Disintegration-of-a-Non-Profit-Corporation


    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you Mr. Goldstein.

    ReplyDelete
  9. WAKE UP THIS IS YOUR ALARM !
    music, lyrics, and vocals by Charlie Pound © 2012
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2dI-yRkFXY

    Verse 1:
    Where did the towers go? Away with the breeze that blows.
    And how much steel did they find? Could it be shipped in time?

    I don’t know I haven’t seen the receipt, but it doesn’t make sense to me!
    All those cars in a line, door handles and engines gone.

    I’d tell you if I could, but you need to ask Judy Wood.
    Before you accuse someone, you better make damn sure you know what was done!

    Chorus:
    Wake up! this is your alarm!
    Wake up!

    Verse 2:
    So while you're sitting on the fence, why don’t you check the evidence?
    I’ll tell you something that you’ll learn, World Trade Center paper doesn’t burn.

    And how could those buildings fall, with a seismic impact so small?
    I know that something’s wrong, eight seconds the north tower's gone.

    I’d tell you if I could, but you need to ask Judy Wood.
    Before you accuse someone you better make sure you know how it was done!

    Chorus:
    Wake up! this is your alarm!
    Wake up!

    Middle eight:
    You know it was 2001,
    here we are and we're still arguing!

    Chorus:
    Wake up! this is your alarm!
    Wake up! this is your alarm!
    Wake up!
    Wake up!
    Wake up!

    “The towers didn’t burn up, nor did they slam to the ground. They turned into dust in mid air.”

    ReplyDelete
  10. Neil Kramer on the Veritas Radio Show

    Neil Kramer: "Anyone, in my view, who denies her (Dr. Wood) research without taking a close look at it is either stupid or they're on the payroll. And that's a bold thing to say and I wouldn't usually bother to say something like that but I feel quite strongly about that. And I've seen her interviewed countless time, I've gone over her research at some length to say the least. I have seen numerous attempts to debunk this woman and they fail. And they fail because she is not dealing with anything other than what is there, right in front of our eyes. She's pretty on top of that ethos. She understands that that's the key to getting more people to look at what she's doing. And she definitely exposes the treachery and duplicity of some very influential factions in the 9/11 truth movement, and they just totally dismiss her work. And you cannot dismiss Dr. Judy Wood's work without being, as I said, either just plain bloody ignorant or completely compromised in some way. So I think it's very important."
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9HTnVLByOs

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'll watch that Mr. Goldstein. Keep it coming.

    JR

    ReplyDelete
  12. I've been watching some of the vids - interviews of Dr. Judy Wood - directed energy - this term I understand. The term "free energy" is used a lot but I wasn't able to understand this term from the interviews.

    This limits the ability of the audience to fully understand what is going on.

    JR

    ReplyDelete

Only by exercising YOUR freedom of speech shall you keep it. Comment now - I can handle it....