Left-Leaning Despisers of the 9/11 Truth Movement: Do You Really Believe in Miracles?

Read entire article HERE.

" An Open Letter to Terry Allen, Noam Chomsky, Alexander Cockburn, David Corn, Chris Hayes, George Monbiot, Matthew Rothschild, and Matt Taibbi1

by David Ray Griffin2
July 6, 2010
GlobalResearch.ca

According to several left-leaning critics of the 9/11 Truth Movement, some of its central claims, especially about the destruction of the World Trade Center, show its members to be scientifically challenged. In the opinion of some of these critics, moreover, claims made by members of this movement are sometimes unscientific in the strongest possible sense, implying an acceptance of magic and miracles.

After documenting this charge in Part I of this essay, I show in Part II that the exact opposite is the case: that the official account of the destruction of the World Trade Center implies miracles (I give nine examples), and that the 9/11 Truth Movement, in developing an alternative hypothesis, has done so in line with the assumption that the laws of nature did not take a holiday on 9/11. In Part III, I ask these left-leaning critics some questions evoked by the fact that it is they, not members of the 9/11 Truth Movement, who have endorsed a conspiracy theory replete with miracle stories as well as other absurdities.

I The Charge that 9/11 Truth Theories Rest on Unscientific, Even Magical, Beliefs..."
-----
Note: Once wonders how things got to this point - where a theologian must remind "rational, impartial, disinterested, "journalists"" that thinkers don't rely on miracles but on cold hard facts and the principles of physics to explain our world - especially when it comes to crime scene investigation.

Thom Hartmann on local Charlottesville, VA radio misrepresents Cass Sunstein's attacks on Freedom of Speech

Thom Hartmann was on local WINA today. I thought it would be a good chance to give him a jingle. I asked Thom about the recent Cass Sunstein paper where Cass advocates infiltrating groups with the ultimate aim of silencing freedom of speech. Unpopular speech that is.

Thom spoke over me while I was answering a question he posed regarding the details of this Orwellian paper. Thom Hartmann guesses - incorrectly - that I hadn't read the paper. Why would he guess that? I replied that not only had I read the paper carefully, but I had written a blog post on the paper. The blog post I wrote, examining Cass Sunstein's paper is available by clicking the inverted Old Glory at the top left of this blog.

Thom seems to misrepresent and misdirect the discussion - I would urge readers to listen to the podcast and also read Cass Sunstein's paper. Make up your own mind.

Thom Hartmann makes his living with the understanding that freedom of speech is the basis upon which he can speak. Why, I asked him, isn't he as concerned as are the rest of us?

I'm afraid that Thom Hartmann, like most DJ's and TV talking heads - is interested in selling books, calling legitimate Tea Party activists "teabaggers" and forwarding the agenda of Israel - regardless of the consequences for American liberty. He has stated on his show that he is, by definition, a Zionist. For the record - I'm NOT a Zionist. I'm an American - and I take the Bill of Rights - especially Freedom of Speech - very seriously. But I'll probably have to fight for my freedom of speech, Thom has backers.

17:17 minute mark is where the evil Jack Rabbit enters the discussion...go to the podcast from March 2, 2010 with Thom Hartmann

CLICK HERE for the WINA broadcast with Thom Hartmann and Jack Rabbit

-------

UPDATE MARCH 2, 2010 Please read this article:

HERE
----------
UPDATE MAR 4, 2010 HERE IS THE PART OF THE PAPER I'M GUESSING THOM HARTMANN HASN'T READ:
"Page 22:

" Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action. "

Updated following deletion of John Adams quote-Article on Orwellian Obama Advisor Cass Sunstein attempt to scapegoat 911 Truth

inalienable |inˈālēənəbəl| adjective unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Ben Franklin


Just when you thought America and her citizens had suffered enough abuse from federal fraudsters demanding that We The People must give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, an ominous doom-cloud looms to further cheat Americans of those sunny rays that are freedom in America - the cloud's name? Cass Sunstein. In this post we will examine his paper "Conspiracy Theories" and contrast some snippets from the paper with videos demonstrating the misrepresentations the paper portrays regarding the 911 Truth Movement and what it stands for.

Wikipedia has a bio on Sunstein:

" Cass R. Sunstein (born September 21, 1954) is an American legal scholar, particularly in the fields of constitutional law, administrative law, environmental law, and law and behavioral economics, who currently is the Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Obama administration. For 27 years, Sunstein taught at the University of Chicago Law School,[1] where he continues to teach as the Harry Kalven Visiting Professor. Sunstein is currently Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law at Harvard Law School, where he is on leave while working in the Obama administration."

So we have another Constitutional Scholar working for We The People in addition to President Obama. Perhaps this "Constitutional Scholar" will go a step further and actually work to uphold the Constitution and Bill of Rights? Just the opposite.

Sunstein co-wrote a paper titled "Conspiracy Theories" with Adrian Vermeule. The paper can be downloaded HERE. The co-author is identified in the paper as a Professor of Law at Harvard and will be referred to as "the other guy" since he deserves no respect. That isn't to say Sunstein does but since he will be working for the Constitutional Scholar in the White House I focus on him.

To get started please listen to the founder of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth (http://www.ae911truth.org/) , Richard Gage AIA, at the 5:41 mark respond when he is asked for a theory as to who he thinks is behind the attacks of 911 if the official story is false. This follows his discussion of evidence from the crime scene that does not support the official hypothesis - in fact - it supports a hypothesis the 911 commission refused to consider - controlled demolition. Pay special attention to the fact that he doesn't start with a conspiracy theory - he starts with a discussion of evidence and resists the urge to jump to conclusions or "conspiracy theories."



Now that you've had a chance to see one member of the 911 Truth movement speak for himself let's examine some excerpts from Sunstein's paper paying special attention to the disconnect between the picture Sunstein paints of "Conspiracy Theorists" and the reality that is the 911 Truth movement he so desperately, and in vain tries to vilify.

Page 2: "Among sober-minded Canadians, a September 2006 poll found that 22 percent believe that "the attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001 had nothing to do with Osama Bin Laden and were actually a plot by influential Americans. In a poll conducted in seven Muslim countries, 78 percent of respondents said that they do not believe the 9/11 attacks were carried out by the U.S. or Israeli governments. What causes such theories to arise and spread?"

Has it ever dawned on Sunstein that discrepancies between the evidence and the explanation given for events would cause such theories to arise and spread? Apparently he's thought of everything under the sun except for this possibility.

Page 3: "Our main ...focus...involves conspiracy theories relating to terrorism, especially theories that arise from and post-date the 9/11 attacks. These theories exist within the United States and, even more virulently, in foreign countries, especially Muslim countries."

May I point out the authors forgot to mention Denmark and Australia as countries where 911 Truth has blossomed? Note that Muslims this and Muslims that. Don't leave out the Muslims. It's crazy people and Muslims - that's all you need to know. Let me know when you see the crazy fanatical conspiratorial-Muslim people Sunstein needs to rob of their rights as you watch the videos below.

DENMARK
Professor in chemistry Niels Harrit and Jakob Hede Madsen interviewed on TV2 - Denmarks largest TV channel:


AUSTRALIA
Richard Gage AIA and Jan Utzon of Sydney Opera House discuss 9/11 truth:


The authors wonder what gives rise to such "Conspiracy Theories." Notice so far that there is no "conspiracy theory" posited by the 911 Truth movement - although after examining the evidence they point out that it contradicts the 911 Commission official conspiracy theory conclusions, and lend support to an alternative hypothesis - controlled demolition. Below is a video you may be familiar with. Another person Sunstein needs to silence?


I can understand why our Harvard Law Professors, guardians of the Bill of Rights and Constitution want to silence citizen-researchers like Richard Gage AIA of Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth. In the following video from Canadian television Gage discusses specifics and hard facts (none of which appear in Sunstein's sciolistic scarefest white paper) like "fuel air ratios" "hydrocarbon" and "iron-rich microspheres" - incantations too fantastic for our Harvard Professors to grasp. Is this why they view members of the 911 Truth movement as witches to be preemptively silenced before they can practice their witchcraft otherwise known as the scientific method?

Other facts discussed in these videos, like the melting point of structural steel, or that no steel-framed skyscraper had ever collapsed due to office fires - puzzles demanding investigation escape our Constitutional Scholars from Harvard. As Omniscient Law Professors from the illustrious Harvard University one would think they could grasp the importance of such sober concerns coming from an architect. Nope - they see terrorists they can't debate in public that must be silenced.

Go to time= 8:41 in the video below-listen to what Gage says when pressed to state a conspiracy theory - HE DOESN'T POSIT ONE. So exactly what/which "Conspiracy Theory" are Sunstein (and the other guy) referring to in their paper? Read their paper - it contains only generalizations. Gage does later talk about directions the investigation might take in light of the evidence collected - of course hypotheses will sprout - but the difference between Gage and what our Harvard geniuses misrepresent him and others as - is that Gage considers alternate hypotheses the official 911 Commission and other government investigators chose to ignore. He puts it simply: "Let the chips fall where they may."

"We bring forward the forensic-based science"


And by the way - for a couple of Harvard professors that like throwing the word "Epistemology" around it is ironic that the recommendations proposed in their sanctimonious "Conspiracy Theory" paper would also quash the Socratic method as a means of finding truth. It is no wonder, with American institutions often following the leadership of the great Harvard University; that with philistines like Sunstein and the other guy in prominent positions that our justice system is a travesty.

Later in the paper Sunstein (and the other guy) speciously draw a link between the thought-mechanisms that make people consider "Conspiracy Theories" and "Anger and Hatred." This is the set-up to start calling dissenters terrorists obviously. Translation - critical thinking skills are bad. Blind faith is good.

So lemme guess - that's the reason he needs to send out secret police and internet shills to ridicule, torment and attack with twisted logic those participating in the grass-roots-led investigation that is the 911 Truth movement. He considers all kinds of problems the government faces when faced with the possibility that a "false conspiracy theory" is spreading. Since he and other wise men can intuitively identify a "false conspiracy theory" they will protect us from ourselves by employing agents by night, infiltrators, and shills to disrupt the process by which the rest of us arrive at truth - evidence - science - debate - questioning. Never explained in the paper is how the rest of us can identify "false conspiracy theories" like Sunstein can without examining evidence and applying the scientific method - perhaps the concept is similar to the divine right of kings?

I am a bit surprised that a Harvard Law Professor doesn't leap at the opportunity to publicly debate a bunch of whackos like architect Richard Gage AIA or a plebian like Jack Rabbit. Why can't he use his impenetrable Harvard logic, scientific method, and Harvard debating skills to discredit people who he pretends don't have their facts straight?

Or does he know how to pick his fights - and knows the only way to stop a movement with the truth behind it is by corrupting the very laws that provide the citizens with the checks and balances on their government. The checks and balances that make a free society capable of dispelling myth through open debate - a society that can stop witchhunts because logic and reason rule over fear mongering and emergency measures that rob us of our liberty? Consider this snippet from this autocratically-minded soon-to-be-advisor-to-the-president's paper:

Page 3: "When civil rights and civil liberties are absent, people lack multiple information sources, and they are more likely to accept conspiracy theories.
...later
In a closed society, secrets are not difficult to keep, and distrust of officialaccounts makes a great deal of sense. In such societies, conspiracy theories are both more likely to be true and harder to show to be false in light of available information. But when the press is free, and when checks and balances are in force, government cannot easily keep its conspiracies hidden for long. ...But it does mean that institutional checks make it unlikely, in such societies, that powerful groups can keep dark secrets for extended periods, at least if those secrets involve important events with major social salience."

Thanks professor - for once I agree with you - so why instead of protecting our liberties, the primary function of our Republic, do you propose the opposite?:

Page 14: "What can government do about conspiracy theories?"

Note: The authors from Harvard seem unaware that the 911 Commission Report is itself a conspiracy theory. Completely omitted is that the facts that have been uncovered by scientists, architects, engineers, pilots etc. linked on the left side of this blog question the conclusions of the official 911 report based on an overwhelming body of evidence. Wesley Clark is a member of Patriots Question 911 Truth - do the Harvard Professors intend to 'cognitively infiltrate' Wes Clark's conspiracy group? Which of the following actions they forward would they recommend for a former head of NATO?

Page 14: " We can readily imagine a series of possible responses.
1. Government might ban conspiracy theorizing."

Note: OK so although the geniuses from Harvard know an open society is the best protection against misguided government secrecy they make this proposal banning free speech - which is an inalienable right. A Harvard Law Professor? Send this clown back to school - somewhere else!

Page 14:
"2. Government might impose some kind of tax, financial or otherwise, on those who disseminate such theories."

Note: By "such theories" Sunstein means those that he and others blessed with special DNA can instinctively tell are "false conspiracy theories" - such as the one he imagines is held by the 911 Truth movement. See above videos where Gage distinctly states that he doesn't have a complete theory. Gage uses an analogy describing the 911 Truth movement as that of a detective who after walking into a room, finds a body and several shell casings. The detective doesn't need a complete theory to perform a thorough investigation. The detective, in order to find perpetrator/s must consider ALL hypotheses, not just the hypothesis Harvard Law Pontiffs anoint, and letting the scientific method and good police work lead to the truth.

Page 14:
" 3. Government might itself engage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories."

Note: Methinks Sunstein protests too much. Counterspeech as he describes is already impemented. But the government agents will lose this battle because when one argues against the truth one ultimately must rely on logical fallacies which are self-defeating.

Page 14:
" 4. Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage in counterspeech"
Note: They already are but they are running into the same problems stated in paragraph above. Radio and TV personalities are backing away from these tactics because they backfire when the truth comes out - ratings drop - TV and Radio shills lose credibility.

Page 14:

" 5. Government might engage in informal communication with such parties, encouraging them to help. ... our main policy idea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groups that produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of 3, 4, and 5.

Page 22:

" Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action. "

Note: The Harvard Law Professor's 29 page paper "Conspiracy Theory" defines a conspiracy theory as:
"an effort to explain some event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role."

So let me get this straight: Harvard Law Professor is proposing government sanctioned conspiratorial acts directed at the 911 Truth Movement while simultaneously proposing that people who know that their government commits conspiratorial acts are "dangerous" and must be pre-emptively silenced.

Page 16:
"According to an anonymous State Department official in charge of anti-disinformation, "a great deal of harm can result 'when people believe these lies and then act on the basis of their mistaken beliefs.' "

Note: This is great information from Sunstein - and I wish to add that I have information from an anonymous State Department official too! I was told by this anonymous top secret source that there are some Harvard Law Professors with absolutely no respect for the United States Constitution committed to the employment of scare tactics to trample on the Bill of Rights.

Page 29:

" Some conspiracy theories create serious risks. They do not merely undermine democratic debate; in extreme cases, they create or fuel violence. If government can dispel such theories, it should do so."

Note: I wonder how having a debate about a conspiracy or not is a bigger risk to democratic debate than the proposals this goof from Harvard is proposing?


Finally:

Consider this excerpt from John Adams' book "A Defense of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America against the attack of M. Turgot"

Considering his interpretation of what our Founding Fathers intended for our Republic, and his portrayal of the 911 Truth movement - do you think Sunstein has good judgement? Do you think he will be a champion of your liberties? Do you think he gives good advice? Does it seem like he thinks he is better than you?

---Note: On Feb 17, 2010 I found the clip below deleted from my blog for some mysterious reason - let me try adding it again - It's from the book mentioned above:

"make our comparison with England and the English constitution Our people are undoubtedly sovereign all the landed and other property is in the hands of the citizens not only their representatives but their senators and governors are annually chosen there are no hereditary titles honours offices or distinctions the legislative executive and judicial powers are carefully separated from each other the powers of the one the few and the many are nicely balanced in their legislatures trials by jury are preserved in all their glory and there is no standing army the habeas corpus is in full force the press is the most free in the world and where all these circumstances take place it is unnecessary to addt that the laws alone ean govern "

----let me try adding the dangerous words of John Adams one more time - Feb 17, 2010

-------


-------------
BONUS VIDEO-Sunstein wants to kill the 2nd Amendment too!


George Washington said:
"Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth. " -what part of that doesn't Sunstein understand?


-----------------
Bonus Video 2

Flag pic borrowed from 911blogger

---------------
Update Jan 18, 2010 Alex Jones discusses Sunstein's radical views in this audio
UPDATE Jan 19, 2010 The 911Truth-Blind U.S. Corporate Media: PUBLIC ENEMY NUMBER ONE
UPDATE JAN 27, 2010 Hey Cass you stupid Ass put Oliver Stone on your list
--------------
UPDATE FEB 2, 2010 Wesley Snipes acquitted of federal tax fraud
Actor also not guilty of conspiracy but convicted for failing to file returns
NOTE: FALSE CONSPIRACY THEORY ALERT - WARNING WILL ROBINSON - Quick - somebody call Harvard Law Professor and Constitutional Scholar and Obama advisor CASS SUNSTEIN (am I supposed to address this 1st Amendment denier as "Doctor?-apologies in advance ...
...find out who the law enforcement people are who came up with this "false conspiracy theory" - infiltrate their "conspiracy group" and tax them.
------------

Some never before seen: NYPD World Trade Center 9/11 Aerial Photos

HERE'S A SAMPLE FROM ABC AT LINK BELOW : MANY THANKS TO ABC!!!


VIEW SLIDESHOW HERE FIRST THEN CONTINUE. Although the twin towers are featured I wish to call your attention to WTC 7 in the pictures - the smoking gun of 9/11.

From the article:
" Looking at these images never gets any easier. The photos that follow depict the horrible images of the September 11, 2001 attacks and the aftermath of the recovery efforts where some 2800 innocent people died, including those aboard hijacked flights American 11 and United 175. ABC News recently obtained these images after filing a Freedom of Information Act request in 2009 with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which had collected as part of an investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center. (Det. Greg Semendinger/NYC Police Aviation Unit"
------
Notes: Whether looking at the pics gets any easier or not makes no difference. One wonders why a Freedom of Information Act request is necessary to gain access to these photos. It is also bewildering that ABC news is interested enough in the WTC attacks to post some pictures but remains silent on the mountain of investigative work done by grass roots citizen investigators.

Pictures 3, 4, and 5 show WTC7 in remarkably good condition.

Remember that all 24 support columns of WTC 7 had to be removed within 1/10 of a second of each other for WTC 7 to collapse in the manner documented in the video below. The official explanation given to the public for the collapse of WTC 7 is that the collapse was caused by fire.

If you haven't yet seen this video please watch it - and compare with above photos.

See time = 6:31 in the video below for diagram showing building position.

Building 7 - Gone in 7 - WHAT YOU ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW ABOUT 9/11 !!

-------
UPDATE: Commission Chairman - The 911 Commission was set up to fail


UPDATE: NIST REPORT ON WTC7 DEBUNKED


UPDATE 60 Aerospace Engineers call for a New 9/11 Investigation
---------
UPDATE FEB 11, 2010 Another article with pictures, valuable additional information

------
UPDATE FEB 11, 2010 WATCH THIS AE911T VIDEO - GREAT PRESENTATION - WTC7



-------
UPDATE FEB 12, 2010 More labeling by propagandist Glenn Beck. This is exactly how you know Glenn Beck is not your friend.


-------
UPDATE FEB 13, 2010 JAMES FETZER - ON RELEASE OF NEW 911 PICTURES

13 seconds can save you 571 pages

American consumers - the following information is provided to assist your development into a more efficient slave for your corporate bosses. The benefits? You benefit because you don't have to govern your governors - more time to spend doing what is important to you. The benefit for your masters? Would you believe me if I told you they are doing this for your benefit and not for theirs? Well - I'm not telling you that - they are. So...How can I save you all this valuable time?

Your masters have prepared a book for you so you can understand what happened on 911 - similar to Grimm's Fairy Tales you may have read as a child. A thick book of fairy tales - fiction. I can't remember if there were any "moral lessons" in Grimm's like Aesop provided. The book prepared by your government is called the 911 Commission Report - normally I'd provide a link - but there are a lot of pages in the book - and after all - who has time to read fairy tales? So where is the efficiency I promised you?

Don't waste your time with the book - you can watch a movie and absorb the same false impressions - especially the unlikely conclusions. Watch this clairvoyant masterpiece below compliments of a "regular guy" wearing your uniform - must be a friendly. Incredibly the television interviewer filmed the precise, and unlikely, 911 building collapse explanation minutes after the event with no investigation at all. His conclusions are in complete agreement with the conclusions of a commission the government stubbornly tried to prevent, and finally reluctantly assembled after 911 victims families mobilized and made such resistance impolitic.

Glenn Beck has stated that he hates the 911 victims families.

Just watch this exhaustive 13 second video to hear the whole fairytale. Don't forget to say thanks because I just saved you the time you would have spent reading a 571-page book of falsehoods- and provided you with a means to swallow precisely the world-view your masters see fit for you to know in just 13 seconds. Now that's efficient!

American "representatives" < Japanese Representatives

The Mystery of 9/11 is 'Now Unraveling,' Says Major Japanese Weekly ... while American media maintain a majestic silence - except for those intent on silencing those citizens with the temerity to ask about the evidence .

Japanese Senators ask the tough questions... you see the representatives of the Japanese people exercise their critical thinking skills in public - aware of bogus origins of the "War on Terror" (whatever that means)-aware that we've all just taken the word of some paid-for people - while ignoring real science. Must be nice to have a functioning government - anyway - take a peek.


Here's what everyone tries to get our "representatives" to look at:


Here are some citizens including first responders trying to get our "representatives" to listen - look at the evidence - how dare they ask their representatives to represent them?


American "representatives" still just can't tell something is wrong...evidence or no evidence...it's all good... the congressman finds an out "there are no vacancies" then runs like hell from the citizens. Is this announced retirement that would leave a supreme court vacancy enough to get a representative to acknowledge the dust study? by clicking here...


Dissenters are dangerous - shut them up quickly before the truth comes out...

Make sure to shut up these people asking questions quickly! " I hate the 911 victims families" - says Glenn Beck. He also demands that they "shut up." Nothing like respect for free speech from a person who relies on the right to free speech to make his millions lying to us every day. I've always wondered what a traitor sounds like...


La la la - I won't hear you


I guess it's unanimous. If you are critical of your government - you need to sit down, shut up, or move to somewhere with a Bill of Rights. Dissent is no longer the highest form of patriotism - it is a clue for NAZIs to herd you up, put you in a camp and ensure that you never get a trial. You are dangerous because you possess critical thinking skills and have not been completely brainwashed by propaganda. How dare you? How dare 911 first responders say they saw molten iron running like in a foundry? How dare they?

-----------EXTRA CREDIT VID-----
Unlikely Heroes
I've seen criticisms that there is no chain of custody of evidence for the dust samples evaluated - this is bogus since you can watch a video demonstrating chain of custody following:

Richard Gage AIA on New Zealand National Television

9/11 Truth: the Challenge to the Peace Movement

part 2


part 3


part 4

Congressman Mike Capuano and Ed Markey get scientific proof of Thermite in 9/11 dust samples.

------------
Note: The BIG LIE, as Hitler knew - just too much to fathom but we all know the fires were 1000 degrees under-temp and you just can't knock down three buildings with two airplanes. 911 really is the cornerstone of our problems - such a dark and disgusting crime it really is almost embarrassing. Our house of reps better get their shit together on this or they will face the consequences that come with dereliction of duty. Treason is not a joke.

Webster Tarpley talk on 911

----------
Note: Humorous aside by Tarpley on hijackers: "...basket-cases...they can't get a drivers license...except perhaps in New Jersey" (laughter)

Why Afghanistan?

Read more here:

" In a nationally televised speech at the U.S. Military Acadamy at West Point, President Barack Hussein Obama announced that he will send another 30,000 American soldiers to Afghanistan. Why is Obama sending so many troops to Central Asia? What is the U.S. military really fighting for in Afghanistan? Why are we still there?"
----------
Note: very thorough article worth your time - pics

How 9/11 Was Done-One Plausible Explanation

Read more here: 

  " Ok, I admit. Some elements in this story are speculative. I do not know for instance if Atta was killed in Germany or in America. But the story is an coherent educated speculation. "

----------

Note:  Here is a theory you may wish to consider.

Machiavelli on Blackwater

Chapter XII of Machiavelli's The Prince is titled: How many different Kinds of Soldiers there are, and of Mercenaries. You can take a look here:


One would think America's military leaders would take into account the lessons of history. I am not saying that Machiavelli is necessarily right about everything he says - but this book hasn't been around since forever for nothing. As I read this chapter I think much of America's recent military misadventures (wars based on lies based on torture) in AFPAKistan and Iraq. In both cases massive numbers of Blackwater and other mercenaries are employed to prosecute these unpopular and foolish occupations.

How many mercenaries are presently deployed and on the payroll of the American taxpayer-funded military-industrial complex? This recent article from TPMMuckraker is enlightening:

" Private contractors employed by the Defense Department in Afghanistan will continue to outnumber the size of the American troop presence, even after President Obama sends 30,000 more soldiers to fight in the war, according to the military's most recent contractor count.

The latest figure on DOD contractors in the country is a whopping 104,100, a spokesman for U.S. Central Command tells TPM. That number, which is expected to grow, is already greater than the 98,000 U.S. troops that will be in the country after the new deployments."

In this Reuters article we learn that DynCorp sees great profits as merchants of death:

" * Defense contractor sees upside from Afghan troop surge

* Looking to strengthen compliance policies

* Shares up 7 pct "

As an American citizen I'm so proud of my leaders for employing losers - mercenaries - to continue these wars based on lies based on torture. We know there is something mighty fishy about the official fairy tale we were fed by the American corporate propaganda apparatus to justify these bloodbaths since nano-thermate chips have been found in dust samples from the 911 WTC attacks. The biggest mystery surrounding the 911 attacks isn't how kerosene fires from two airplanes collapsed three buildings at free-fall speed - it becomes "Who put the nano-thermate in the towers?" I digress - but remember that the attacks of 911 were the reason for both murderous wars - and that our leaders that continue to perpetuate these lies are not to be trusted - especially with the lives of our soldiers. Given that - how can they be trusted with the life of our nation?

Here are some lessons Machiavelli has for our brilliant leaders regarding the use of mercenaries. Think of this every time you hear them tell us that they have a plan that will "work" : (Please excuse paraphrasing)


1. Mercenaries and auxiliaries are at once useless and dangerous, and he who holds his State by means of mercenary troops can never be solidly or securely seated.

2. Mercenaries and auxiliaries are disunited, ambitious, insubordinate, treacherous, insolent among friends and cowardly before foes.

3. Without fear of God or faith with man, whenever they fight they are sure to be beaten; so that in peace you are plundered by them, in war by your enemies. (Sound familiar?)

4. The cause of which is that mercenaries have no tie or motive to keep them in the field beyond their paltry pay (not paltry these days) in return for which it would be too much to expect them to give their lives.

5. They are ready enough to be your soldiers while you are at peace, but when war is declared they make off and disappear.

6. Captains of mercenaries are either able men or they are not. If they are, you cannot trust them, since they will always seek their own aggrandizement, either by overthrowing you who are their master or by the overthrow of others contrary to your desire.

7. On the other hand, if your captain be not an able man you are sure to be undone.

Read it for yourself - do you agree the American government disagrees with Machiavelli?

Read here about a captain of mercenaries ironically named Prince. Look him up - do you see any parallels with his role as a captain of mercenaries and the writings of Machiavelli?

If you didn't think these wars based on lies based on torture were losers before - I beg you to reconsider.
---------------
UPDATE DEC 5, 2009 Is Erik Prince 'Graymailing' the US Government?

UPDATE DEC 16, 2009 DOD: Obama's Afghan Surge Will Rely Heavily On Private Contractors

Sydney Opera House?

Richard Gage AIA speaks with designer on 911 Truth:

Two Videos re 911 for your consideration...

Video 1

1st WTC Attack: Both Jules Naudet & Pavel Hlava:


Video 2
Bush Caught Lying About September 11th


Bonus

Congressman Brad Sherman's office admits Explosives found in WTC Dust

Read more here


blogsurfer.us

Bag'o'Dust: 9/11 Truth Niels Harrit on Nanothermite Evidence GoodMorning Denmark

Here's a good visual of where the dust evidence comes from:
Notice it doesn't say Good Morning America because America isn't awake yet to say "Good Morning" to before showing them evidence of foreknowledge and pre-planted explosives in the WTC buildings on 911.


Former Prime Minister of Denmark WAS TOLD which demonstrates that somebody had foreknowledge. Damn, didn't they tell the building occupants to go back into the second tower? Look here.

"We - ehh - I received a message 5-10 minutes before it physically happened"



Here's another worth seeing if you haven't already:


Type "Pullit" into Google and see what you think about the vid.

---------------UPDATES
OCT 18, 2009 From 911Blogger on Foreknowledge, vids check it out: (click) HERE
--------
OCT 18, 2009 DON'T FORGET RUDY GIULIANI admitted foreknowledge on ABC - video see 24 second mark: here. Giuliani says he was told the building would collapse in ten or 15 minutes.
-----------------------
OCT 18, 2009 From File No. 9110161
WORLD TRADE CENTER TASK FORCE INTERVIEW, EMT RICHARD ZARRILLO, Interview Date: October 25, 2001 click HERE with video
------------------
OCT 18, 2009 For Mayor Willie Brown, the first signs that something was amiss came late Monday when he got a call from what he described as his airport security - - a full eight hours before yesterday's string of terrorist attacks -- advising him that Americans should be cautious about their air travel.-from Sept 12, 2001
-----------
OCT 18, 2009 Heads-Up To Ashcroft Proves Threat Was Known Before 9/11
----------------
OCT 18, 2009 John Ashcroft warned:CBS - July 25, 2001: "In response to inquiries from CBS News over why Ashcroft was traveling exclusively by leased jet aircraft instead of commercial airlines, the Justice Department cited what it called a "threat assessment" by the FBI, and said Ashcroft has been advised to travel only by private jet for the remainder of his term...The Justice Department insists that it wasn't Ashcroft who wanted to fly leased aircraft. That idea, they said, came strictly from Ashcroft's FBI security detail. The FBI had no further comment.
---------------
OCT 18, 2009 Pentagon foreknowledge-or just good advice? Jim Miklaszewsky reporting from Pentagon feels an explosion - wonders if it is part of the construction going on...(bomb-proofing the segment of the Pentagon that took the hit) - "interestingly enough...uh..one intelligence official here in the building said, after what appeared to be a coordinated attack on the world trade center, his advice was to stay away from the outside of the building today just in case..."
Note: The intel person got the outer ring and day of attack correct. Why not stay away from the outside of the building for as long as it takes to know the "coast is clear?" There were fighter aircraft flying over Washington D.C. for many days following the attacks. If it was prudent to maintain vigilance elsewhere, why not especially at the Pentagon in the following days?