9/11 CONSPIRACY: BUSH-NAZI CRIME FAMILY HISTORY

There's an AIPAC sucker born every minute in the US: YOU PAY so Israelis can play - (short vid too)

"Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said yesterday he was prepared to consider shortening Israel's work week to four days and lengthening the weekend.

"It is impossible to stop the train now that it has left the station," Deputy Prime Minister Silvan Shalom, who had proposed the move, said yesterday. "We must move to a long weekend as soon as possible, in keeping with all the developed world states."

Read more HERE

Yes - those foreign aid tax dollars are finally paying off!  (...errr - NOT for you Americans - ha ha - no....you need to go back to work to your THREE JOBS (SEE BELOW) so YOU can buy weapons for Israelis to shoot whomever they feel like with)

UNIQUELY AMERICAN: "GET ANY SLEEP???"

Message to US agents: 'We'll chop your heads off'

"Anonymous messages conveying threats and other warnings are common in areas hit hard by Mexico's drug war, but it is rarer for them to threaten U.S. law enforcement. Authorities do not know who left the message, which was removed."
Read more HERE
-------
Note:  They should say that it has been rare in the past to threaten U.S. law enforcement.  I sense a complete lack of fear of U.S. law enforcement.  They've probably infiltrated U.S. law enforcement anyway since our system is so corrupt.  Oh well - I expect this drug war to continue until the public gets sick of paying for it.  But that's taking quite a while.  Maybe when the public only has money to buy food and water - yes - then they'll be able to do the math once their heads are focused.

Russian Envoy: NATO Preparing Libyan Ground Invasion

Nimmo, in my opinion, puts it out there....
"I think that now we are witnessing the preparation stage of a ground operation which NATO, or at least some of its members… are ready to begin,” Rogozin said."
Read more HERE

Kagan: Just another lyin' sack of food for the mushroom-masses

"In a letter to committee Chairman Lamar Smith, Texas Republican, and the panel’s ranking Democrat, John Conyers Jr. of Michigan, the lawmakers said that “contradictory to her 2010 confirmation testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee,” recently released Justice Department documents show that Justice Kagan “actively participated with her Obama administration colleagues in formulating a defense” for the law.

"

Read more HERE

-----------------

Note:  Forgive me - but isn't "contradictory" a euphemism for "lie?"

I don't want anyone to get the impression that I'm surprised - after all - our judicial and injustice systems are obviously a joke.  But - let's not mince words here folks.

When I hear about another judicial decision - I......just..............(snoring sounds)

Now I'm dreaming......of....a classroom on constitutional law - what in the living fu&k are they talking about?  I mean - really - puleeeeez don't tell me they are talking about that gwadammed sheet of paper!

Let me help anyone in law enforcement, law, "justice", legal "scholarship" in the U.S. - let me help you save your honor - fucking kill yourself.  You are fucking worthless.  Just worthless - and we'd be better off without you - and so would your poor family - since you are a disgrace to your country and - worse - disgracing a corrupt illegal system.  Yeah - that's bad - a disgrace to a corrupt system.

If you are  judge, lawyer, lawman - etc.... - and you are not involved in the truth movement - obvously you are a "test-taker" - a useful idiot of the military-industrial-educational-legal system - sanctioned by the foresaid - as a willing participant in the undefinable "war on terror" - obviously a useless follower with no ability to think independently and call a spade a spade.

Think about how worthless you are my law-enforcement useful-idiot fellow Amerikans:  do us all a favor and - don't go away mad - just go the fuck away.

Is "Constitutional Scholar" Obama really just a "Graffiti Vandal?"

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0d/Constitution_We_the_People.jpg

Some say Obama broke a law when he made a fund-raising video in the White House "Map Room."
"The White House contends that the video is legal, noting that the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) issued a memo in 1979 explaining that the president can solicit funds in the White House, so long as he does so in the residential portion of the mansion, not in a room used for official business.

However, Hans von Spakovsky – former member of the Federal Election Commission and a Heritage Foundation legal analyst – told CNSNews.com that that exemption may not apply in this case because it appears that the video was not filmed in an area where the president actually lives."

Read more HERE

Is this "minor" violation of OUR LAWS really unimportant?  Is Obama, as role model, really serving our country by demonstrating such a lackadaisical attitude toward respect for ALL LAWS?  Is it reasonable to assume that committing lesser offenses eventually leads to a general diminishment of respect for the law - as in the "Broken Window Theory?"  

"... disorder and crime are usually inextricably linked, in a kind of developmental sequence. Social psychologists and police officers tend to agree that if a window in a building is broken and is left unrepaired, all the rest of the windows will soon be broken. This is as true in nice neighborhoods as in rundown ones. ...

Philip Zimbardo, a Stanford psychologist, reported in 1969 on some experiments testing the broken-window theory. He arranged to have an automobile without license plates parked with its hood up on a street in the Bronx and a comparable automobile on a street in Palo Alto, California. The car in the Bronx was attacked by "vandals" within ten minutes of its "abandonment." The first to arrive were a family—father, mother, and young son—who removed the radiator and battery. Within twenty-four hours, virtually everything of value had been removed. Then random destruction began—windows were smashed, parts torn off, upholstery ripped. Children began to use the car as a playground. Most of the adult "vandals" were well-dressed, apparently clean-cut whites. The car in Palo Alto sat untouched for more than a week. Then Zimbardo smashed part of it with a sledgehammer. Soon, passersby were joining in. Within a few hours, the car had been turned upside down and utterly destroyed. Again, the "vandals" appeared to be primarily respectable whites."----------

Obama's disrespect for OUR RULE OF LAW - sets the example for others to follow.  When called on his trespasses - we are bombarded with excuses - one is on "interpretation" - as if the Constitution is just too complicated for "us" - you know - the "mushroom masses" to understand.  In fact - we are asked to believe that it's too complicated for our elected representatives to bother with - but I beg to differ - so does Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas:

The following is an excerpt from Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's Wriston Lecture to the Manhattan Institute last Thursday:

"As I have traveled across the country, I have been astounded just how many of our fellow citizens feel strongly about their constitutional rights but have no idea what they are, or for that matter, what the Constitution says. I am not suggesting that they become Constitutional scholars -- whatever that means. I am suggesting, however, that if one feels strongly about his or her rights, it does make sense to know generally what the Constitution says about them. It is at least as easy to understand as a cell phone contract -- and vastly more important."

 Why,indeed, would a "Constitutional Scholar" need "legal counsel" to provide an interpretation of the law?  Perhaps it provides a skirt to hide behind when pesky legal questions come up. 

I've been living with the impression that details like "dotting I's and crossing T's" mattered when legal matters were involved.  I thought definitions - like the meaning of what the word "is" is.  But now I'm starting to wonder if I've had it wrong all along - that details don't matter.  Heck - now that I'm thinking about it - forget the details - the law itself doesn't matter anymore.  

When I say "any more" I mean - since the election campaign.  It appears that during an election campaign - the law can be cited to attack an opponent so as to win the office - then later - the very same laws that would limit the new president's power - are "unimportant" - "irrelevant" - "politically motivated carping" - and are to be dismissed.  Pay special attention to time=2:13 in the following video showing the "legal scholar" pontificating about the dangers of .....well... what he is presently doing:

OUR LAWS ARE FOR EVERYONE TO FOLLOW - NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW - AND THE CONSTITUTION WAS INTENTIONALLY WRITTEN IN CLEAR CONCISE LANGUAGE SO THAT WE THE PEOPLE, WOULD KNOW FOR OURSELVES WHEN IT IS TIME TO CHAIN DOWN A BEASTLY GOVERNMENT.  

AntiSec: 'Fraternal Ownage of Police'

"For the third knockout blow against Arizona law enforcement, we decided to get 
destructive. We're defacing eight AZ Fraternal Order of Police websites and
releasing a master list of over 1200 officer's usernames, passwords, and email
addresses. Additionally we are leaking hundreds of private FOP documents and
several more mail spools belonging to FOP presidents, vice presidents,
secretaries, a police chief, and the FOP Labor Council executive directory and
webmaster whose insecure web development skills was responsible for this whole
mess. We're doing this not only because we are opposed to SB1070 and the racist
Arizona police state, but because we want a world free from police, prisons and
politicians altogether."

Read more HERE

The Corrupt Corporate Incarceration Complex

"It wasn't until two years later that she found out why. In Scranton, Pennsylvania, two judges pleaded guilty to operating a kickback scheme involving juvenile offenders. The judges, Mark Ciavarella Jr. and Michael Conahan, took more than $2.6 million in kickbacks from a private prison company to send teenagers to two privately run youth detention centers. Since 2003, Ciaveralla had sentenced an estimated 5,000 juveniles. Conahan was accused of setting up the contracts. Many of the youngsters shipped off to the detention centers were first-time offenders."
Read more HERE