Read entire article here:
" Monsanto has immediately responded to the study, stating that the research is "based on faulty analytical methods and reasoning and do not call into question the safety findings for these products."
The IJBS study's author Gilles-Eric Séralini responded to the Monsanto statement on the blog, Food Freedom, "Our study contradicts Monsanto conclusions because Monsanto systematically neglects significant health effects in mammals that are different in males and females eating GMOs, or not proportional to the dose. This is a very serious mistake, dramatic for public health. This is the major conclusion revealed by our work, the only careful reanalysis of Monsanto crude statistical data.""
-------------
Note: I wonder how Monsanto knows where the pollen from their plants will land when, as far as I know, no human being can predict which way the wind will blow 100% of the time. Oh - that's right - they can't. This means they are contaminating everything with their handiwork - without really knowing what the repercussions will be. But - it's probably a safe bet that in the end they will be in control of the food supply - and we will be at their mercy. Talk about a weak negotiating position.
Note #2: I should point out that I hate the Huffington Post because they are either cowards, stupid, or traitors for helping keep the public ignorant of 911 Truth. But the Monsanto issue is so huge I had to link to them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Only by exercising YOUR freedom of speech shall you keep it. Comment now - I can handle it....
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.